My view on the pale blue dot
changed a lot by each iteration. The text itself was very thought provoking and
moving. I am a huge fan of Carl Sagan and have read this article before. Carl
Sagan is a master with words and expressing them in a thought provoking manor
and well as driving home a point. The text iteration really shows that. The
listening iteration is even more emotional. Carl Sagan’s has a great narrators
voice to begin with. He emphasis words that I normally would not emphasis
reading to myself. He also changes his pitch at the end of some sentences that
are not questions necessarily but are thought provoking statements that he
himself ponders and ultimately gets read as a question. When it came to the
video it was way to fast for Carl Sagan’s voice. Pictures where flashing of
things he was mentioning and you were more focused on trying to figure the past
pictures rather then listening to the words. I think the video took away from
Carl Sagan’s great article and hindered it of its main point. I believe the
video could have been made in a way that it would have helped. If the pictures
were slowed down and not just pictures but a free flowing video and less of a
power point. If anyone interested this is a much better version:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYtXoUZbUCQ&list=FL8H81D-3c7AaOUknIo9TQxA&index=5&feature=plpp_video
Just watched the vid you recommended. Wow. I wouldn't say better though. Completely different, yes. A close reading of both shows the messages of as worlds apart (pun intended), though the words are the same. ...I also like the intro part of your video--very cool.
ReplyDelete